Where has all the Chromosorb® gone?

As many of you who use packed columns know, many of the Chromosorb® materials that were once plentiful are now in short supply. Personally, I don’t know the exact details of why this has happened, but unfortunately, it has happened, and we (technical service) get calls about it all the time. As I result, I decided to pass along some information to our customers. I would like to list the solid supports which we no longer have in our inventory. They include:

Diatomaceous Earth Materials:   Chromosorb® WNAW (60/80), GNAW (60/80), WHP (60/80 & 100/120), PAW/DMDCS (80/100 & 100/120), Silcoport® WBW (80/100 & 100/120).

Porous Polymers:  Chromorsorb®101 (60/80, 80/100, 100/120), 102 (80/100), 103 (60/80 & 80/100), 105 (80/100), 106 (60/80) and 108 (80/100).

Restek is looking to obtain alternative sources to those materials which we are either out of, or those whose supplies are limited, so always feel free to call Customer Service for pricing/availability, or Technical Service for alternative packing choices (if available) for your specific analysis.

What are your Technical FAQ’s?

Although we (the technical service group) have tried to capture the most frequently asked questions (FAQ’s) from our customers and post them onto our website at www.restek.com/Technical-Resources/Troubleshooting, I am sure there are many more questions out there. In your lab, what is your most common technical question? You can let us know in several different ways; post your question in the “Leave a Reply” section below, send me an e-mail using the link above, or e-mail your question to support@restek.com (please write “FAQ BLOG Question” in the subject line). We will acknowledge that we received your question, and answer it to the best of our abilities. In a few weeks, I’ll let everyone know the top three questions we received (and hopefully the answers).

20th Norwegian symposium on Chromatography stays Unique in its kind

January 8-10  the 20th edition of the Norwegian Symposium on chromatography was organized in Sandefjord, Norway.  This symposium takes place every 2nd year and has developed into a successful event where around 240 chromatographers get together to present and learn developments on chromatography.

The symposium offers a nice combination of scientific and commercial developments with a strong social program that allows for many informal contacts and networking.

Over 240 participants in plenary section

Besides running 3 parallel sessions to accommodate the different presentation, there is also a poster session, which grows bigger every year. Poster prizes are there to stimulate young scientists and there is also a trip to Pittcon (this time Orlando)  to win, which is announced during the official diner. During the 2 days, there is also an exhibition showing the latest product developments, focusing on chromatography.

Restek presented on latest developments in GC and also on obtaining faster GC using existing instrumentation. Find here a summary on fast GC. Reduction_of_analysis time.

And on latest developments: Latest developments in petro.

It would be nice if a focused, low threshold, meeting like this would be possible in other countries.

Additionally you will like Norway because of the clean air, the beautiful nature and everybody speaks English.

How to Increase the Life Time of your GC Columns? Part VI : Use of Guard Columns

Fig. 1 Contamination of fused silica columns can be easily removed by cutting-off the first section

Most of the time the impurities accumulate in the first meter(s) of the column. As the separation process in the capillary starts here, the unwanted interactions that take place will impact immediate the initial band width.  By cutting off the contaminated section, the sample will be introduced in a “clean” section and we obtain similar separation as before..  See fig 1.

Many users choose for connecting a guard column in front of the analytical column.

The guard column protects the analytical column for contamination, which dramatically increases the column life time. Such a guard column can be trimmed when polluted and eventually be replaced.  Depending on the application  guard columns have a life time of 1 week up to 6 months.

 

Deactivated fused silica tubing can be used as guard column and can purchased per meter of which a defined length. Usually this is 2-5 meters. Disadvantage of cutting parts of the guard column is that the column becomes shorter resulting in change of retention times. If similar length is cut every time, the change of retention becomes predictable. One can also replace the guard entirely when contaminated. This way retention times will always be similar.

Fig. 2 cutting fused silica: slide in one direction with a ceramic wafer

Bigger challenge is to make the coupling. Best generic results are obtained using a universal PressTight® connector. Make a 90-degree cut, (fig 2), by using a ceramic wafer and let the wafer slide one-way along your nail,  wet the column and guard ends with some methanol and push it into the PressTight . By pushing it, an optical “ring” is observed (see fig.3) which is the actual seal made by the polyimide and the surface.

http://blog.restek.com/?p=4168

A more elegant solution that eliminates column coupling is to use Integra-Guard® columns

Fig. 3 When making the connecting a "brown" ring must appear.

 

Integra-Guard® Columns

Integrated Guard columns have been first introduced by Restek® Corporation around 1990 and have been widely used since. Integrated guard columns are prepared by coating only the last section of the column. This technique is also called “segment” coating.

The advantages are clear. As there is no coupling present we have all the advantages of having “no coupling”..

-          No connection to make, saves lots of time

-          No leaks, improved stability and more accurate data

-          No dead volumes/ activity or thermal mass

-          Easy in maintenance; integrated solution

Fig. $ Making Integrated guard column: No coupling at all, used widely with Rxi-5Sil MS

Such Integra-Guard® columns are typically 5 – 10 m in length and can be made for most standard stationary phases and mostl column diameters. Important is to make a clear mark on the column where the guard column starts. Not every stationary phase can be used as an Integra-Guard® solution. The column needs to be deactivated first, followed by a second deposition of the stationary phase layer.  There are different phases that can be manufactured with an Integra-Guard® guard column.   Working with integrated guard columns allows the user to use cut a piece periodically from the inlet, without the trouble of making a coupling. Integra guard solutions are avialable for a series of phases: Besides the Rxi-5Sil MS see also:

http://www.restek.com/pdfs/59441.pdf

 

 

 

EPA 8270 with Appendix IX: 145 Semivolatile Compounds in 17 Minutes

 

Using an Rxi-5Sil MS 30m x .25 x .25 and a Sky single taper WITH WOOL inlet liner, I ran an eight point 8270 calibration including the Appendix IX compounds. The calibration range was 0.5 µg/mL – 120 µg/mL, with individual points at 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 120 µg/mL. The attached Excel spreadsheet lists all the raw responses and relative response factors as well as compound by compound linearity evaluations (as %RSD) and is color coded to show failures based on 8270C and 8270D calibration criteria. SPCC and CC compound criteria were taken into account for 8270C evaluations.

The spreadsheet details compound linearity evaluations for four different ranges: 0.5 – 120, 0.5 – 80, 1.0 – 80, and 1.0 – 120. Only 7 of 138 target compounds did not meet 8270D %RSD linearity requirements in one of the four calibration ranges. Two additional compounds (a total of nine compounds) did not meet 8270C %RSD linearity requirements. By dropping high points and using linear regression as instructed in 8270C and D, method 8000 linearity criteria was met for all nine of the compounds. You can view the linear regression lines by clicking on any of the following chemical names: benzaldehyde, o-toluidine, benzoic acid, 2,4-dinitrophenol, 4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol, diallate, 1,3,5-trinitrobenzene, atrazine, and 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide.

The chromatogram on display at the top of the article shows a standard run at 10 µg/mL (IS/SS at 20 µg/mL). The peak shapes are excellent, with the vast majority of the compounds showing symetric peaks and little to no tailing. I’ve zoomed in on a few examples: Pyridine (m/z 79), 2,4-dinitrophenol (m/z 184) benzo[b]fluoranthene and benzo[k]fluorantheneindeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene and dibenz[a,h]anthracene. Notice the minimal tailing on the last few PAH compounds in the chromatogram section below, starting with 3-methylcholanthrene and ending with benzo[ghi]perylene.

For the really curious, I’ve uploaded detailed quant reports for the 10 µg/mL, 40 µg/mL and 120 µg/mL standard runs so you can how the peak shapes change as the column approaches overload. The calculated concentrations are not correct (the quant database hasn’t been updated) but the integrations should be.

While the last compound is eluting at 17 minutes, the full instrument cycle time is closer to 26 minutes. The instrument run log shows that 15 injections were completed in just under six and a quarter hours. This should leave ample room for a full 20 sample batch as well as calibration and QA runs within the 12 hour tune window. Instrument acquisition parameters can be found here, and if you are running Chemstation ea.02.00 sp2 or later, you should be able to import this zipped method file. The calibration kit I used and other semivolatile standards are summarized in this handout.

 

The Dynamic Duo is Here: Introducing a New Blood Alcohol Column Set!

*Cue theme music*

Although I generally don’t highlight specific products in the blogs I write, I’m going to break my pattern to introduce the new blood alcohol (BAC) column set. Over the past several months, I’ve had the great luck to be able to work closely with our team of polymer chemists and engineers throughout the development of these columns, and I was astounded by the level of control over polymer selectivity that they have. It’s as if they have their own bat cave of selectivity tools to use in the fight against coelution!

Using the tools at their disposal, our chemists redesigned both the BAC1 and the BAC2 columns. The new products are named the BAC Plus 1 and the BAC Plus 2 . I was pushing for “The Dynamic Duo”, but for some strange reason, that product name got shot down. But really, like the Batman and Robin, this column set consists of two parts that are very different from one another but work together very well. In this case, the goal is to get the highest level of separation between the relevant BAC compounds in the shortest amount of time. All of the compounds of interest for the BAC application are fully resolved from one another in less than two minutes, and peak shape for all compounds is great. With the combination of resolution, analysis time, and inertness, these columns have proven themselves to us as being the best in the industry. I think the figure to the right does the best job of telling the story.

I’ve said that these columns have proven themselves to us, but since we just introduced them today, I’m waiting with bated breath to hear how they work for you. If you are interested in purchasing these columns, please feel free to contact Restek’s customer service department. If you have any other questions, you can contact our tech service department, or me directly. And once you try them out, I’d love to hear any comments that anyone may have!

Modified EPA SOP RSK-175 Using a Teledyne Tekmar Purge and Trap Concentrator

Purge and Trap Analysis of using RSK 175 methane in drinking waterThe US is in the midst of a “gas” rush from Colorado to New York State. Gas containing shale sites will become common vernacular with names such as, Barnett, Devonian, Marcellus, Utica, Antrim, Haynesville, and New Albany. Several regions have what are known by the energy companies as stacked plays, that is, areas where two or more gas shale regions overlap resulting in huge potential output. For instance Marcellus, Utica and Devonian have significant overlap in Pennsylvania making that state a prime location for drillers 1. Concern over natural gas finding its way into drinking water was confirmed by the Dimock Case where 14 homes had well water contaminated with methane. Another case involved bubbling water on the Susquehanna River where it is believed that gas was migrating from gas wells that are located 2 to 3 miles away. Methane in private drinking water was detected in six homes near the river and ranged in concentration from 2.2 ppm to 55.8 ppm (mg/L) 2. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP) has warned that concentrations over 28 ppm are of concern since the methane may partition out of the water and into the home with risk of explosion 3.

Many states are expected to adopt a variation of RSK-175 for the analysis of natural gas in drinking water 4. The PA DEP has
developed a method 5 based on a paper published which calculates the saturation point of methane for standard preparation. Both techniques are done using headspace with flame ionization (FID) as the preferred method of detection. Tekmar recently presented a modified technique at the Eastern Analytical Symposium (EAS) which used Purge and Trap and a proprietary trap in the concentrator. A Stratum PTC and AQUATek 100 Autosampler were coupled to the GC-FID 6. The Rt-U Plot column was used in a 30m x 0.53mm ID column. Restek offers an improved version of this column the Rt-U-Bond column (cat#19750) that offers lower bleed and less particle generation compared to the Rt-U-Plot columns. Calibration standards were made from stock standards by calculating the saturation of the gases at 0°C. For instance methane’s concentration after bubbling through chilled water for 2 hours is 39.59 ppm, ethane is 131.7 ppm and ethylene is 281 ppm 7 . Samples were also run by headspace to compare the results between the two approaches 8. Calibration for methane ranged from 20 ppb to 40,000 ppb with an average RSD of
10%. Real world drinking water samples were run by the PA DEP using this method.  This method met the criteria outlined in both the RSK175 and the BOL6019 methods5.

Teledyne Tekmar’s Application Note on Modified RSK 175 by Purge and Trap http://www.teledynetekmar.com/resources/app_notes/VOC/Stratum/Purge_and_Trap_RSK175_Fracking.asp

Teledyne Tekmar’s Application Note on RSK 175 by Headspace http://www.teledynetekmar.com/resources/app_notes/VOC/HT3/EPA_Method_RSK175_Dissolved_Gasses_in_Water_Matrices_using_HT3.asp

*Correction 12/13/2011: The pressure was listed in the figures as 19.44 psi. The pressure should be listed as 4.82 psi. I made changes today to the blog to reflect the correct pressure. Thank You Blog Readers for your comments and help with this article.

How Cool is PFTBA: Tuning Your MS in the Challenger Deep

Per-Fluxo-Carbon?

Not only is perfluorotributylamine a perennial favorite for tuning mass spectrometers, it looks like the flux capacitor!

But that’s not all.

Perfluorocarbons (PFCs), including PFTBA, are used in blood substitutes. Severe blood loss compromises circulation, an effect that can be countered through volume-replacement therapy. However, circulation does the patient little good if what’s in the arteries can’t supply oxygen to tissues. Natural blood’s oxygen-carrying ability is due to the hemoglobin found in red cells. Blood substitutes don’t contain cells; the PFCs are prepared as an emulsion in a complex saline brew, and the tiny suspended droplets of PFC perform as a sort of cell-analog. Such substitutes exhibit effective O2 transport, but also numerous side effects.

Still not impressed? PFCs are used for liquid breathing. Remember in James Cameron’s The Abyss, how they sent Ed Harris down to some outrageous depth? And remember that they first demonstrated the breathable liquid on the other guy’s pet rat? Well the rat part, at least, is real. Total Liquid Ventilation (TLV) in real-world dives by humans is something that I doubt has actually been done. But it’s cool!

I know the movie isn’t set in the Mariana Trench, in fact it’s not even in the same ocean. So in case perhaps I’ve failed to relate the post sufficiently to its title, I’ll throw in something else really cool I learned while researching. If you were to sink Mt Everest in the deepest part of the Mariana Trench, its summit would be more than 7,000 feet underwater.

That’s deep, man.

 

How to Make a Good Enough Column Cut Using Metal (MXT) Capillary columns?

 

In a previous blog we zoomed into the cutting of fused silica columns, http://blog.restek.com/?p=4168

Many people do not realize that the metal columns (MXT columns)  are chromatographically very close to fused silica and even outperform fused silica on several fields:   MXT columns are virtually unbreakable making them first choice at applications where the column will be stressed like:

  1. High temperature applications ( Simdist, Triglycerides, Biodiesel, Waxes, Surfactants);
  2. Small coiling applications (portable GC’s, small oven designs, multi column solutions);
  3. Direct heating  (using the conductive properties)
  4. Harsh environments (process analyzers, special measuring modules)

Chromatographically, MXT columns offer high efficiency, reproducibility, low bleed and also offer high inertness due to the unique Siltek deactivation Restek has developed. For example: even a 0.1 micron MXT-based biodiesel column shows near perfect peak shape for tough components like hexane diol, chlorophenol and propylaniline, see Fig.1.

Fig.1 Siltek deactivation makes MXT metal tubing highly inert

The reason why fused silica is preferred is mainly because of its ease-of-use. Compared to metal its easy to cut, couple, coil and the ends are also self straightening. For practical applications metal columns will only be considered, if fused silica does not meet expectations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cutting of MXT is more difficult. Practical MXT cutting can be done in 2 ways, depending on the application.

Fig.2 Ceramic wafer can be used for cutting MXT: need to make a "sawing" move for making a scratch. NEVER do this with fused silica!

 

Fig.3 MXT cut obtained usen ceramic wafer. Not ideal, but good enough for split, splitless and PTV injection

 

Method 1: If MXT columns are used in split/splitless/PTV type applications, where the column cutting is not critical, one can take the ceramic wafer (figure 2, http://www.restek.com/catalog/view/61 )

and use this to make a scratch on the MXT. This can be done by making a “sawing” move using the roughest side of the wafer. After the scratch is made, the column can be broken by bending the column, while supporting the column on the opposite side of the scratch.  This cut will look like figure 3. Its not an ideal cut, but it will be good enough for listed injection techniques, and will also work for the detector side of the MXT column.

 

Method 2: If MXT columns are used with on-column, direct, valve or for making a coupling, the column ends need to be cut much better using the MXT column scorer, see figure 4, http://www.restek.com/catalog/view/8275 This device works exactly like a normal tube-cutter. The outside of the MXT tubing is equally scored and after breaking a very nice column cut is obtained, see fig 5.

 

Fig. 4 MXT capillary column scorer

Fig.5 MXT end view after using the MXT scorer. Ideal end shape for making on-column, direct, valve as well as for MXT-column coupling

How to Increase the Life Time of your GC Columns? Part III Gases, Flows and Practical Operation

For operation of GC columns a carrier gas is required.  In the first blog of this series we zoomed into the importance of using clean carrier gas.  We also have a choice on type of carrier gas. Mostly Helium is used, because of its high optimal velocity and inertness but that gas is loosing its attractiveness for several reasons.

Helium is becoming more and more expensive, increasing cost per analysis. This will not change as the supply of helium is also not secured.

One of the main sources of helium in Amarillo, Texas, will be drying up.  We have to consider alternatives. http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/info/newsroom/2007/january/NR0701_2.html

Alternatives are available for many applications using Hydrogen. One has to deal with safety aspects, but its not as dangerous as people always seem to think. See for details our blog on hydrogen: http://blog.restek.com/?p=3520 risks are very low and we can take precautions.

Helium has also disadvantages.  It’s my personnel experience that I found that columns used under hydrogen show a more lasting inertness then used under helium I always blamed low level residues of sulfur compounds to be responsible for that, but I never could proof that.

A big challenge all must know is that helium diffuses through the fused silica. That means that if you take a column out of the GC, in 16 hrs there is no helium present anymore and depending on how good you seal the column, it will be completely evacuated or filled with lab-air, see http://blog.restek.com/?p=568 .

We know that Restek columns filled with lab-air, have no problem when kept at ambient temperature, but you need to be aware of this. That means also, when you install the column in GC you need to flush very well before heating as there is air (meaning water and oxygen)present.  Because air contains water, this is also entering the column. For alumina column this means high temperature conditioning as the water will deactivate the alumina.

Fig 1. Leak detection will assure correct column installation and reveil possible septum or leaks in the gas lines. Its an investment that is earned back in very short time

 

Whatever gas we use, leaks and gas purity are always a big challenge.  The higher the temperature of the  injector, column and detector, the more problems we can anticipate. Leak detection can be done nowadays with sophisticated instruments like a leak detector. See fig.1. Such a leak detector is measuring on the principle of gas conductivity and is very sensitive for H2 and helium. Its clean and it will give an audio or visual alarm if a leak is detected.  Such a device is also practical for checking the septum seal as the septum is probably the biggest leak in the system.(but many do not realize that).

 

I also list the injector and detector on purpose as many seem to forget that in this part we have high temperatures and activation can be very fast. See the extreme data generated by activity in a 6890 FID.

 

When you do not use the column and want to keep it in the GC, always maintain a positive flow through the column and keep it at a temperature of 80-90 C.  I have seen many times that when the flows are turned off, back diffusion of air can occur even into the gas lines. Keep the split flow to a minimum value of 5-10 m/min to save carrier gas.